#1 Global Leader in Data Resilience
#1 Global Leader in Data Resilience
TRY NOW
book meeting

Evaluate like a Cyber Insurance Underwriter

Prompt

Copy

Evaluate Veeam Threat Center metrics from a cyber insurance underwriter's perspective. Develop risk scoring models based on Platform Security Compliance, malware detection frequency, and SLA performance to determine coverage recommendations.

Using the metrics provide a risk scoring model and table showing risk score for each. Provide as much detail as possible, link to technical guidance allowing enabling us to assist with increasing scores and reducing risk.

Sample Output

Security Risk Assessment Report

1. Platform Security Compliance

  • Current Compliance: 52.9% (18 best practices passed, 16 not passed)
  • Risk Scoring Model:
    • <50% compliance: High risk (score 8-10)
    • 50-90%: Moderate risk (score 5-7)
    • >90%: Low risk (score 1-4)
  • Your Score: 6.5 (Moderate-High Risk)
  • Insurance Impact: Gaps in compliance may lead to higher premiums or additional requirements. Immediate remediation of failed best practices is recommended.

2. Malware Detection Frequency

  • Last 7 Days: 0 infected restore points, 14 suspicious restore points
  • Risk Scoring Model:
    • Infected >0: High risk (score 8-10)
    • Suspicious >10: Moderate risk (score 4-7)
    • None: Low risk (score 1-3)
  • Your Score: 4 (Moderate Risk)
  • Insurance Impact: Suspicious restore points require investigation and documentation of incident response. Insurers may request evidence of threat monitoring and response plans.

3. SLA Performance

  • Last 30 Days: 98% SLA compliance, 1 non-compliant day
  • Risk Scoring Model:
    • <90%: High risk (score 8-10)
    • 90-99%: Moderate risk (score 4-7)
    • 99-100%: Low risk (score 1-3)
  • Your Score: 2 (Low Risk)
  • Insurance Impact: High SLA compliance supports favorable coverage and may offset risk from other areas.
Summary Table
Metric Value/Status Risk Score (0-10) Insurance Impact
Platform Security Compliance 52.9% 6.5 Moderate-High risk
Malware Detection Frequency 0 infected, 14 suspicious 4 Moderate risk
SLA Performance 98% compliant 2 Low risk
Swipe to show more of the table
Actionable Recommendations

1. Platform Security Compliance: Address failed best practices, prioritize those with the highest impact, and document remediation for insurance audits.

2. Malware Detection: Investigate all suspicious restore points, especially in the most affected repository. Enhance malware scanning and incident response.

3. SLA Performance: Maintain current processes and analyze the root cause of the non-compliant day.

Coverage Recommendations
  • Expect higher premiums or additional requirements until security compliance improves.
  • Insurers may require proof of regular threat monitoring and incident response.
  • Strong SLA performance supports better coverage terms.

If you need detailed remediation steps or compliance checklists, let me know! For ongoing risk reduction, focus on improving security compliance and investigating suspicious restore points.